Sounding Circle: Who Killed California?

 Who Killed California?3 comments
picture 31 Jul 2003 @ 22:22, by Raymond Powers

Though his facts may or may not be accurate, doesn't this smack of just a bit of racism?

Who Killed California?

July 30, 2003
By Patrick J. Buchanan

With Gov. Gray Davis facing recall, a budget $38 billion in deficit, and a bond rating dropped three notches by Standard & Poor's to near junk-bond status, the lowest of all 50 states, the Golden State is no more.

Who killed the goose that laid the golden eggs?

Certainly, Davis, who misled voters about the gravity of his budget crisis in 2002, and won re-election by demonizing his GOP rivals, deserves his 20 percent approval rating. But Gray Davis did not kill California.

The United States government did. For what killed California as the golden land was massive and unrestricted immigration from the Third World, an unrepelled invasion from Mexico, and a failure to protect the U.S. manufacturing base and the wages of America's workers.

During and after World War II, California became a bastion of our defense, aerospace, auto and TV industries. Hundreds of thousands were hired to become the highest-paid manufacturing workers on earth, giving California the world's highest standard of living. The average California wage once stood at 130 percent of the average U.S. wage.

In the 1970s and 1980s, however, Japan, a free rider on America's defense, began to engage in predatory trade, attacking and killing, one by one, U.S. industries and capturing U.S. markets with subsidized exports.

California suffered first. Our TV industry was wiped out. Our auto industry was reeling when Ronald Reagan stepped in to impose quotas on Japanese cars. Reagan also intervened to save the semiconductor industry, Big Steel and Harley-Davidson. Unlike today's free-trade fanatics, Ronald Reagan put America first.

But it was under Bush-Clinton-Bush that California was irrevocably sacrificed to the gods of the Global Economy.

During Bush I's term, millions of Mexicans began to flee north to seek jobs and take advantage of the health care, welfare and free education American citizens provided for their people. For one-third of the illegals, California became the destination of choice.

What the U.S. government should have done was obvious, and was demanded by Americans: Enforce our immigration laws, halt the invasion, restrict immigration from the Third World. But America's politicians – out of fear of being branded xenophobic and to curry favor with Big Business, which benefits from an endless supply of low-wage labor – did almost nothing to protect America.

Californians tried to defend their state. As illegals poured in by the hundreds of thousands yearly, they passed Proposition 187, denying social welfare benefits to illegal aliens who had broken the law and broken into the United States.

The open-borders coalition, repudiated and routed, ran to a federal judge, who annulled the voters' victory. Davis then refused to appeal the overturning of 187 to the Supreme Court. Hispanic voters rewarded him in 2002, and California state and local budgets continued to hemorrhage.

By the 1990s, an exodus of taxpayers had begun. Fed up with being fleeced to subsidize illegal aliens, Californians began leaving for Nevada, Idaho, Arizona and Colorado. Two million native-born Californians left the state in the 1990s, as immigrants, legal and illegal, sent poverty rates soaring in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino and Orange counties.

This, then, is what killed California:

First, open borders. By failing to enforce our immigration laws, America now hosts 31 million legal immigrants and their children and 10 million illegals, most of them net tax consumers. California got the lion's share.

Second, global free trade and the trade deficits it produced, now running at an annual rate of $562 billion in May. This has killed millions of manufacturing jobs, as thousands of companies closed factories here and shifted plants to Mexico, Asia and China.

The Third Worldization of California is now far advanced. Yet those responsible, Bush Republicans as well as Clinton Democrats, still cannot see what they have done to our country.

But what is happening in California is not confined to California. It is happening across America. Unless we elect a president who will enforce our immigration laws and defend our borders, unless we find a Congress that will jettison the free-trade madness that is denuding America of her manufacturing, what has happened to California will happen here.

President Bush appears oblivious to it all – but then, so did his father before him.


[< Back] [Sounding Circle]

Category:  


3 comments

3 Aug 2003 @ 22:51 by Greg @68.7.237.30 : not racism - fact
it's an overriding fact that the open-border/unmanaged immigration laws are one main factor in the implosion of economics due to overburdening of the system. A majority of people in search of better lives here in the US are living on the dole without paying back into the system. They are living beneath the line, paying no taxes, and seeking medical help without insurance, etc. They shouldn't have to come in through the basement window when they can come in through the front door and be accountable. Meanwhile organizations like Ranch Rescue are having to take things into their own hands to stop drugs and rapes from occuring at the border. Calling it racism is a superficial reaction when easily tricked into as a means of a trigger for dissent (driven by Hegalian chessplayers of the world), when in fact this is a much deeper issue. The FBI and border patrol are having run-ins with Mexican military on US soil. We are left paying for a system that is not working, and meanwhile we are not sure if 'Al-Qaida' or whatever is coming across the border. The same goes for the majority Chinese-owned cargo containers coming into the ports. It's not racism to raise concern about inefficiencies in the infrastructure. Liberals are often duped by their compassion, while conservatives are often duped by their greed.  


4 Aug 2003 @ 09:11 by raymond @66.250.33.100 : Mmmm...
Wellm you seem to have it all figurd out, don't you.  


4 Aug 2003 @ 22:21 by Greg @68.7.237.30 : there's nothing to figure out
without adequately maintained infrastructure that benefits all, then illegal immigration into the US hurts BOTH sides of the border, and further endangers people on BOTH sides of the border - in more ways than one.  


Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:


Other entries in
21 Feb 2006 @ 13:53: Black Box Voting
20 Feb 2006 @ 08:09: Kurt Vonnegut on the State of the Union: Custodians of Chaos
16 Feb 2006 @ 16:41: Excerpt: How to Steal an Election
19 Nov 2005 @ 00:03: Bay Area Filipino-American authors give voice to their unique culture
7 Jul 2005 @ 17:02: The So-Called "Brain Behind Bush": Guilty of Treason?
9 Nov 2004 @ 20:50: MYTHIC DIMENSIONS of ELECTION 04, HOPE FOR AMERICA
20 Oct 2003 @ 23:05: Wealth Doesn't Mean Free Press
17 Oct 2003 @ 20:07: Arnold to Settle Lawsuits for Pennies on the Dollar?
30 Sep 2003 @ 22:48: The Subpoenas are Coming!
4 Aug 2003 @ 21:57: Electronic Frontier Foundation Issues E-Voting Alert



[< Back] [Sounding Circle] [PermaLink]? 


Link to this article as: http://soundingcircle.com/newslog2.php/_v195/__show_article/_a.htm

Main Page: soundingcircle.com