Sounding Circle: The Most Sweeping Gun Ban Ever Introduced in Congress

 The Most Sweeping Gun Ban Ever Introduced in Congress1 comment
picture 3 Aug 2003 @ 22:14, by Raymond Powers

The Most Sweeping Gun Ban Ever Introduced in Congress--Clinton Gun Ban "Reenactment" Bans Millions More Guns

H.R. 2038, introduced by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), does not just "reenact" or "reauthorize" the 1994 Clinton ban, the so-called "assault weapon" law. It bans millions more guns. And it begins backdoor registration of guns. All told, it's a giant step closer to the goal stated by Clinton gun ban sponsor Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), on CBS 60 Minutes "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in, I would have done it." There is no 10-year sunset provision in the bill. H.R. 2038 permanently bans every gun that is currently banned and, with numerous, overlapping provisions:

Bans every gun made to comply with the Clinton ban. The Clinton ban dictated the kinds of grips, stocks and attachments new guns can have. Manufacturers and gun owners complied and new guns conform to the Clinton requirements. H.R. 2038 bans the new guns too.

Bans guns exempted by name or type under the Clinton ban. Commonplace Ruger Mini-14s, Mini-30s, Ranch Rifles, .30 Caliber Carbines, and fixed-magazine semi-automatic center-fire rifles.

Bans all semi-automatic shotguns. Bans Remington, Winchester, Beretta, Benelli, and other shotguns commonly used for hunting, trap, skeet, sporting clays, and self-defense. Bans them by banning their main component, called the "receiver" (Sec. 2(a)(30)(J)), and bans them because they have "any characteristic that can function as a grip"(Sec. 2(H)(ii) and (b)(42)). Any characteristic.

Bans all detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles because they have "any characteristic that can function as a grip." (Sec. 2(a)(30)(D)(iii) and (iv), and (b)(41) and (42)). Any characteristic.

Bans target shooting rifles. Bans the three centerfire rifles most popular for marksmanship competitions: the Colt AR-15, the Springfield M1A and the M1 "Garand."

Bans guns for self-defense. Bans any semi-automatic shotgun or rifle an Attorney General one day claims isn't "sporting," even though the U.S. Constitution, the constitutions of 44 states, and the laws of all 50 states recognize the right to use guns for defense.

Bans 65 named guns (the Clinton law bans 19); Bans semi-auto fixed-magazine pistols of over 10 rounds capacity; Bans frames, receivers, and parts used to repair or refurbish guns; Bans importation of magazines exempted by the Clinton ban; Bans selling a legally-owned "assault weapon" with a magazine of over 10 rounds capacity.

Bans guns rarely used in crime. A fact demonstrated by every state and local law enforcement agency report on the subject. The Congressionally-mandated study of the Clinton ban found that the guns "were never used in more than a fraction of all gun murders."

Begins backdoor registration. Requires manufacturers of guns, frames, receivers, and other parts to report the names of their dealers. Requires dealers to report any of the guns and parts they have in stock. Bans private sales of the guns and parts. The next step is to register individual purchasers.


[< Back] [Sounding Circle]

Category:  


1 comment

3 Aug 2003 @ 23:03 by Greg @68.7.237.30 : gotta stop these morons
sure, disarm the public, while only criminals and the police have guns. It worked for Hitler, Stalin, and Mao, why not hte US?

I'm not here or there on inert objects such as guns, but it IS our 2nd Amendment right, and enacting gun laws is just an excuse to get a hand on the Constitution to rewrite it. Our forefathers warned us about this. It's a known fact that in cities where the laws are more liberal, the crime goes down. In Britain and Australia where the citizens have been increasingly disarmed, crime against children, senior citizens, and 'minorities' has skyrocketed. It's time people see through the veil of lies and strive for a more level playing field. I have faith that someday people will recognize their integrity and responsibility, but until then there's not enough people in the US that understand what made Ghandi successful.  



Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:


Other entries in
21 Feb 2006 @ 13:53: Black Box Voting
20 Feb 2006 @ 08:09: Kurt Vonnegut on the State of the Union: Custodians of Chaos
16 Feb 2006 @ 16:41: Excerpt: How to Steal an Election
19 Nov 2005 @ 00:03: Bay Area Filipino-American authors give voice to their unique culture
7 Jul 2005 @ 17:02: The So-Called "Brain Behind Bush": Guilty of Treason?
9 Nov 2004 @ 20:50: MYTHIC DIMENSIONS of ELECTION 04, HOPE FOR AMERICA
20 Oct 2003 @ 23:05: Wealth Doesn't Mean Free Press
17 Oct 2003 @ 20:07: Arnold to Settle Lawsuits for Pennies on the Dollar?
30 Sep 2003 @ 22:48: The Subpoenas are Coming!
4 Aug 2003 @ 21:57: Electronic Frontier Foundation Issues E-Voting Alert



[< Back] [Sounding Circle] [PermaLink]? 


Link to this article as: http://soundingcircle.com/newslog2.php/_v195/__show_article/_a.htm

Main Page: soundingcircle.com